Intervention to increase seat belt use at a primary care center.
نویسنده
چکیده
BACKGROUND Increasing seat belt use represents an ideal opportunity for preventive health care in family practice. Little evidence exists, however, that primary care physicians can increase safety belt use. METHODS Three hundred twenty-six patients seen in a rural primary care center were randomized to either a control or intervention group. Before their health care examination, patients completed a short questionnaire concerning seat belt use and then viewed a 6-minute videotape explaining reasons to wear seat belts (intervention) or espousing general preventive health care guidelines with no mention of seat belts (control). In 6 months the questionnaire was again administered with no further intervention. RESULTS Two hundred forty-three (74.5 percent) patients completed both baseline and 6-month questionnaires. Seat belt use increased significantly from baseline to 6 months for the intervention (22 to 37.3 percent, P = 0.00052) and control (20 to 33.6 percent, P = 0.00085) groups; however, the difference between the increase in the intervention (37.3 percent) and control (33.6 percent) groups at 6 months was insignificant (P = 0.641). The most common reasons for not using seat belts were forgetfulness (40.3 percent), fear of being trapped (26.7 percent), and lack of comfort (21.8 percent). CONCLUSIONS Seat belt use increased in this study, although the intervention videotape was no better than the control videotape at increasing restraint use. This increase in use supports office-based intervention to improve seat belt use, but further research is needed to clarify the mechanism and extent of change possible.
منابع مشابه
Drive Alive: Teen Seat Belt Survey Program
OBJECTIVE To increase teen seat belt use among drivers at a rural high school by implementing the Drive Alive Pilot Program (DAPP), a theory-driven intervention built on highway safety best practices. METHODS The first component of the program was 20 observational teen seat belt surveys conducted by volunteer students in a high school parking lot over a 38-month period before and after the mo...
متن کاملPredictors of rear seat belt use among U.S. adults, 2012.
INTRODUCTION Seat belt use reduces the risk of injuries and fatalities among motor vehicle occupants in a crash, but belt use in rear seating positions is consistently lower than front seating positions. Knowledge is limited concerning factors associated with seat belt use among adult rear seat passengers. METHODS Data from the 2012 ConsumerStyles survey were used to calculate weighted percen...
متن کاملEffective Factors of Seat-Belt Use in Front Seat Passenger on Urban Trips of Bushehr: Application of Protection Motivation Theory
Background and Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the constructs of protection motivation theory (PMT) for predicting seat-belt use in front seat passenger on urban transportation. Methods: In this cross sectional study, 328 participants who traveled in urban streets during the past week as a front seat passenger during February to May 2018 were selected through multistage cluste...
متن کاملReducing the burden of road traffic injury: translating high-income country interventions to middle-income and low-income countries.
OBJECTIVE To increase seat belt restraint use in Guangzhou City, People's Republic of China. DESIGN Comparison group pre-test, post-test design. SETTING Guangzhou City. INTERVENTIONS Interventions to increase the prevalence of seat belt use in high-income countries (enhanced training and enforcement practices along with raising of public awareness) were adapted and implemented in Guangzho...
متن کاملThe increase in lives saved, injuries prevented, an cost savings if seat belt use rose to at least 90 percent in all States.
The 1,652 additional lives saved in all 38 States and the District of Columbia resulting from the increase in seat belt use would represent an increase of 11 percent above the estimate of lives saved by seat belts (15,147) for 2007. Over 50 percent of the total benefits in lives saved (842 out of the total of 1,652 lives saved), non-fatal injuries saved (22,677 out of the total of 39,486 non-fa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
دوره 5 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1992